Hubble Space Telescope - Chapter 3

ywjpheejmuas10 Says:

Oct 18, 2009 - i have a qustion? some people say god created everything.....but who created god then?

wplusm1win Says:

Oct 18, 2009 - this video has no fact in it at all, its all theory. A wrong theory.....

cronoslogic Says:

Oct 18, 2009 - And you base your statement on what? You're just another asshat spouting off with terrible grammar and zero substance.

binoyrakesh Says:

Oct 18, 2009 - I go with an old hindu theory that says God IS everything. you, me, hubble telescope, the universe - is GOD.

garycomp Says:

Oct 22, 2009 - what proof have you got that god does exist

mesasarly Says:

Oct 22, 2009 - well said

americandodgeball Says:

Oct 24, 2009 - The narration of this video is over-simplified, but it's still a better explanation than just, "God made everything."

LockItUp420 Says:

Oct 24, 2009 - You're an illiterate pile of shit, why don't you try typing in proper English if you want to bash someone. P.S. Religion is for power hungry men, get over your ignorance. You're a sucker and a fool.

Paatte Says:

Oct 27, 2009 - all this is theory, there is noway to know this for sure... They say that stars die and make up clouds and shit that makes new stars, how do we not know that maybe 2 fucking small stars get laid and make a bigger one? Maybe a supernova is just a star that's cumming? HOW THE FUCK CAN U KNOOOOW?!?!?!?! the big bang happened billion of years ago so tell me, pleaseFUCKING TELL ME HOW THE HELL U CAN BE SURE WHEN U SAY THAT THE BIG FUCKING BANG HAPPENED? i do believe in the tea bag experience though.

imjinc2k Says:

Oct 28, 2009 - It's not entirely theory, there's a great deal of observation too. We've observed stars 'dying' as supernovae. We've taken spectra of the ejected material (nebulae) to determine which elements it is composed of, just like spectroscopy can tell if your tap water is contaminated. It contains the stuff you'd find on earth. Fusion is well established As for the Big Bang, nobody is sure that it happened, but we can be reasonably sure that something LIKE it happened based on the evidence we see.

imjinc2k Says:

Oct 28, 2009 - bino, I'm not religious but I tend to agree. Without your heart, you couldn't exist. Without the physical universe and its behaviors, life could not evolve. So we are bound together in this way, ever changing collections of particles undulating through the whole as leaves on a tree. We are the soup and the soup is us.

demianusa Says:

Oct 30, 2009 - Paatte and wplusm1win I'm sure we should all forget about all the observations, research, mathematical calculations, and brilliance of people like Albert Einstein and Stephen Hawking and go agree with your baseless arguement.

tanglewordMRBOGGLE Says:

Oct 30, 2009 - i'm not questioning hubble's integrity, but i find it bizarre that it can only produce images of Sedna of just a few pixels, yet it can produce strong, vivid images of nearby galaxies and rather clear images of galaxies billions of light years away. why is this? was hubble built to capture distant images only? it would be well appreciated if one could enlighten me with this bit of knowledge. thanks!

ThePyrxBand Says:

Nov 1, 2009 - Hubble doesn't just use optical technology to capture images. Instead every picture is made up of several different sensor readouts, processed by a sophisticated computer program.

CELIBERICO Says:

Nov 2, 2009 - lol....this is a joke. theories and bullshit. lol ! hog wash bullshit.

dachief69 Says:

Nov 2, 2009 - i've watched many vids on hubble, it would be interesting to find out the answer to that.

Gautamiyer2 Says:

Nov 8, 2009 - go die in a fire. Celibrico

moontoot Says:

Nov 8, 2009 - yep, bunch of slugs thinking they got the answers, we don't know sheet, guess all you want and look like newbs.

dontaeVega Says:

Nov 9, 2009 - Lol its funny how they know all this.

Naughtyexcellento Says:

Nov 13, 2009 - distant galaxies are far but produce a lot of light which hubble collects to produce images. However, objects like sedna are near but they are small and dim, which make them hard to see

TacoBellBproductions Says:

Nov 13, 2009 - God All Day

doctorwintercold Says:

Nov 16, 2009 - If the hubble can produce such detailed pictures of very distant galaxies,why have I not seen a single clear shot of our own solar swstem planets?!

cronoslogic Says:

Nov 16, 2009 - Because, like most people that make this observation, you miss the obvious and never bother checking into it . You can find the answer to this question with a simple search, of course, using the proper keywords. Then you'll find the numerous sites documenting exactly what dates Hubble shot the Moon, Mars, Jupiter, Venus, Mercury, et cetera. Unfortunately, most people spout these questions with such certainty before actually looking into for themselves. Eh, what's up Doc? Don't deserve that PhD?

GMonkey325 Says:

Nov 17, 2009 - Edwin Hubble also discovered the Doppler effect which dectects red and blueshift and that tells us whether an object in space is moving away or toward us. What Hubble can detect is pretty incredible since the upgrades, but it is also dependant on the way a star is formed, its distance, size, and what it is capable of emitting etc... because Hubble is now equipped to gather an array of image types.

HiddenTheTruth Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - Hubble had been sending outstanding pictures of far away world, which makes us know and understand our universe, i hope in near future we'll able to see in depth of our own soler system and planets like mars. " WAIT MARS... MAN IS COMING TO TAKE OVER...."