Election 2K H8

AntidoteY Says:

Sep 24, 2009 - I'm pretty sure when I go on life support, it will not be in some woman's body against their wishes.

metaldemon1175 Says:

Sep 27, 2009 - fetus or not. its a human regardless u dumb fuck

emetophobia777 Says:

Sep 27, 2009 - AntidoteY, have you ever seen a video called "The Silent Scream"? Google it. If you don't want all the educational bits, skip to part 3 (graphic). What you see is a fetus trying to get away from the abortion instrument. The fetus reacts in the same way a "living human" does to danger. It tries to move away but has no place to run. To wit, it is fighting for its life. If it weren't another entity, then its will should be that of the mother, and the will of the mother is its death.

davidi42 Says:

Oct 3, 2009 - AntidoteY perhaps you should have been aborted.

Guitardude8794 Says:

Oct 17, 2009 - Promoting God is what this country needs. Just wish the fucking democrats would realize that

WhimsicalQuandary Says:

Oct 17, 2009 - Freepers are really racist.

WhimsicalQuandary Says:

Oct 17, 2009 - Also: KILL WHITEY!

MRog47001 Says:

Oct 20, 2009 - It's encouraging to see this man stand up for his core beliefs and not go along with the liberals support Obama. I'm white and just like him, I voted for McCain..not because he's white, but because Obama stands for EVERYTHING I'm against. I'm sure some of you will call me a racist because I didn't vote for Obama, but I would vote for a black person over a white person in a heartbeat if he/she shared my values. Obama is ruining this country. Don't listen to what he says, watch what he does!

MRog47001 Says:

Oct 20, 2009 - So, what you're saying is that all infants which are born pre-maturely (not fully developed) and need life support to survive (cannot survive outside the mother's body) aren't really human and deserve to die? I can assume you weren't born pre-maturely because you're here. If you were, you're not really human and should die.

AntidoteY Says:

Oct 20, 2009 - Nope. I'm saying that if it cannot think, conceptualize, feel pain, speak, or display signs of self-awareness, it isn't human. Unborn fetuses suffer less when aborted than the animals we slaughter daily for our food. Is it tragic? Yes, but making it illegal would result in tons of unwanted children, and we all know conservatives don't wanna have to pay for the social programs and services necessary to give those unwanted fetuses good lives if they got to be born anyway.

AntidoteY Says:

Oct 20, 2009 - Um, if you ask me, Obama's gonna do a lot less damage than Senator McCain, who would've probably continued an aggressive, damaging foreign policy which would've ruined the U.S.'s reputation for good, especially after 8 years of the Chimp. Besides, Sarah Palin was a fundamentalist Christian, and I don't want any of those in my government, thanks very much.

MRog47001 Says:

Oct 20, 2009 - If you can't see what's right in front your face, there's no sense in me trying to convince you. All I can say is, if change is what you wanted, change is what you're going to get. Under Obama, freedom as we knew it is coming to an end. If you want government to control every aspect of your life, including how much you drive, who you choose as your healthcare provider, whether your kids need parental consent for vaccinations and ABORTIONS IN SCHOOL, etc, etc, then Obama was a good choice.

AntidoteY Says:

Oct 20, 2009 - Ooh! Abortions in school! I didn't vote for Obama, I voted for a 3rd Party Candidate, but I prefer him to McLame/Failin'.

MRog47001 Says:

Oct 20, 2009 - McCain wouldn't have been my first choice either, but you prefer a terrorist-sympathizing, America-hating, socialist who can't produce ANY documents or written papers from all the time he spent in college and who can't even prove that he's a natural-born U.S. citizen over a war veteran who spent years as a P.O.W., never once bad-mouthing his country to gain brownie points from other countries who hate us and want nothing more than to see us dead? Yeah, that makes sense.

AntidoteY Says:

Oct 20, 2009 - I don't think socialism is a bad idea, so that criticism isn't one for me. As for whether or not he's a U.S. citizen, I didn't know you were a birther, so LOL. And if by "badmouthing his country to gain brownie points from outher countries who hate us," you clearly, clearly have no knowledge of the history of U.S. foreign policy and intervention in the 20th Century. Here's a hint; we cared more about protecting our corporate interests in other countries than human rights. Learn history.

MRog47001 Says:

Oct 20, 2009 - It seems that you need to get away from the Oprah show and CNN for a little while and read some history yourself. It makes sense, with you being a socialist "spread the wealth" sympathizer and all, that you really cannot think for yourself, but instead rely on the liberal media to give you your opinions... sad really. On the whole corporate interests/human rights thing, the US has done way more than any other country to help others in need while still having the balls to stand up to tyrrany.

AntidoteY Says:

Oct 20, 2009 - Please. The U.S. backed its share of terrorism and thugs in Latin America, the Middle East, Asia, etc. We have a fundamental disagreement, so I'm not gonna bother continuing this discussion. Have a nice day.

MRog47001 Says:

Oct 20, 2009 - I agree there is corruption everywhere. The way things are today, I think you have to be at least somewhat corrupt to even become the president... whether it be Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush Sr., etc. But, I've never seen it at the level at which it is right now. We'll just have to agree to disagree. You have a nice day too.

wolfhalen Says:

Nov 9, 2009 - Obama has not continued the damaging foreign policy unless you count the fact that nothing at all has changed now a government that can't manage a "Cash for Clunkers" program is going to take over health care. oh joy

AntidoteY Says:

Nov 10, 2009 - Would you prefer that corporations whose exclusive motivation is profit, and not your health concerns, and whose bottom line is not your well-being, but in providing for its investors, be the ones entrusted with our health? If you want to make well-being and health a commodity only afforded to the affluent, that's your prerogative. I have the moral capacity not to view health care as something that ought to center around profit.

wolfhalen Says:

Nov 10, 2009 - I gotta respect you for that very intelligent comment I just view this bill as a subsidy for insurance companies. I don't believe the government has our best interest in mind, when they allow fluoride in the water, and GMO foods. These things cause illness, and are unnatural I must note that I tend towards the conspiracy, when the lying filth ruling class is the topic. I also voted for a 3rd party can. :)

wolfhalen Says:

Nov 11, 2009 - I see that Anti-humanitY failed to provide a counter argument to the fact that this bill subsidizes the very corporations that he refers to Instead he resorted to hyperbole in my channel nothing new here folks yeah I said that it's a conspiracy, as in conspiring against people the only "nuts" are ones who don't think that happens, when all of history proves that the ruling class are nothing but predators.

AntidoteY Says:

Nov 11, 2009 - I oppose Obama's healthcare bill. I wrote on your wall what I wrote precisely because on your friends list are various channels which propagate false, defamatory, hateful, and malicious things about Jews. You pal around with racists and sociopaths.

wolfhalen Says:

Nov 11, 2009 - You don't sound like you oppose the bill, so sorry if I missed that Those people have legitimate things to say about Zionists not all Jews are Zionist, and not all Zionists are Jews

draxisace Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - I believe that the use of the n word is the same as any other word it may be used, but not offensivly.