Billy Connolly ~ Womens demands

luckyvet Says:

Nov 6, 2009 - No theory, only facts. 1 is a tribe in Indonesia (got it from a feminist website) the other is in a remote area of China. Google 'current' Matriarchal societies and you'll find the same thing consistent with them all. Another example of a matriarchal society is most of Africa. Without intervention, they would have never evolved from the stone age. Fact: Patrarchy = longer childhood, children with higher IQ's, more life success. 90% of our inmates are from single mother homes.

samsagitarias Says:

Nov 6, 2009 - Again in todays society not eaxctly correct ( and yes i do know what i am talking about) , but you havent answered my question - On what evidence do you back up your statement that in societies where women are leaders that there is no written language and are still locked in the stoneage

samsagitarias Says:

Nov 6, 2009 - ummm having studied the Social Sciences at Uni - sorry that fact re Patarchy - not true - sorry its not, and yes, i can back up what i say with actual hard fact - and that other figure about inmates - again not correct - and yes again can back it up- what are your sources , mine are university text books

luckyvet Says:

Nov 6, 2009 - Social sciences in University = witchhunt against men, backed by a lesbian doctrine to make all women think they're victims of oppression. Facts: Common man couldn't vote just a few years prior to women. The oppression they teach is based on their emotionally dysfunctional warped view of the normal harmonious interaction between men women. Therefore: University text books, published by companies owned by the Rothshilds (I'm miles ahead darling) who are feminist supporters.

luckyvet Says:

Nov 6, 2009 - Feminism: Funded by the CIA The Rockafellers for 2 reasons: A. To get women in the work force B. To get children into day care / school early to indoctrinated them into mindless corporate worker drones who look to big gov't for solutions. Today, the protector/provider alpha male has been replaced by police/nanny state. All about divide/conquer tactics to keep you I fighting while they expand their power.

samsagitarias Says:

Nov 6, 2009 - no, fella your waaaaaaaaay behind. My father has his doctoriate in this field and i used his text books amongst others and he is not a woman you prat !!

luckyvet Says:

Nov 6, 2009 - No name calling please. I have your father owned 10 times over. Self made multimillionaire before 30, looking at you, your dad, your profs from 1 mile up. Its a gigantic puzzle, you've been duped by a ruling elite.

samsagitarias Says:

Nov 6, 2009 - this is not about money who the hell mentioned money ???? dont care how much money you havet it obviously has not made you a happy individual - ruling elite ? you seem to think that your part of that from your statement above - after all, if not, then why mention it ? You seem to have the need to tell me how much your worth - and that speaks volumes

samsagitarias Says:

Nov 6, 2009 - incidently - where i live - we dont have the CIA !!

luckyvet Says:

Nov 6, 2009 - Relax little sister. All this 'fighting' and 'contempt' is exactly what they want. "Government issues policy that keeps men, women, races divided, while it expands its power whenever wherever it can." - George Carlin.

samsagitarias Says:

Nov 6, 2009 - Yes, but i personally dont think that one sex is superior to the other - both are equally important - both have alot to offer, both are equally as intelligent and capable - no one sex is better than the other at all in any way shape or form - we are simply all human beings just trying to get through life as best we can - man, woman, boy girl - what matters is we have more pressing issues and conerns - like global warming if we dont address that then we wont be around to argue about anything !

6ame Says:

Nov 6, 2009 - I never said both genders weren't equally important, you seem to have misread what I said. I said women do not give men credit for their achievements, I was having a go at the moron who said that behind every great man was a strong woman, I call bullshit on that, a great man is a great man regardless of what woman has her claws sunk into him, she is not what makes him great, being great is what makes him great.

samsagitarias Says:

Nov 6, 2009 - you did, . you said that" women cant give men credit for anything without trying to leech of their acheivements its pathetic" plus thereby insinuating that one sex was trying to appear superior to the other by "leeching" Also that saying "Behind every great man is a strong woman" did it ever occur to you that perhaps it could mean that the two work as a team ? whoever is behind who was a support - the saying is open to interpretation - and no one is right.or wrong

6ame Says:

Nov 7, 2009 - I never said both genders weren't equally important, you seem to have misread what I said, AGAIN. No, it's nothing to do with partnership, it's a simple tactic used by women to claim some sort of credit for men's positive achievements, that's why you never hear "He's in touch with his feminine side" or "He has a strong woman behind him" when he's done something negative, only when it's positive, it's the classic leech mentality.

samsagitarias Says:

Nov 7, 2009 - no i have not misread what you have said - your wording may be off , but it really reads as if your doing down one sex over the other - making out that the man is the downtrodden little mouse and the woman is the big evil cat !!! re read what you have said - or re phrase it, as your coming across as doing down one sex over the other you have sad it again here "a tatic fro woman to claim some sort of credit for mens positive achievments" - i find your views sexist - and ill informed - grow up.

6ame Says:

Nov 7, 2009 - "re read what you have said - or re phrase it" So translate what I say into anything you want? I believe it is you should grow up. You have twisted my words from minute one, I am very clear in what I say, and I do not mean all women, I simply mean the ones who say "In touch with their feminine side" or "A strong woman behind him", it's pitiful at best, as are your attempts at shaming me into silence by saying I'm sexist, I'm not, I'm a realist, deal with it.

samsagitarias Says:

Nov 7, 2009 - Like you say, you have been clear in what you say, so far from twisting your words, i have simply read them and then expressed my opinion - which if you dont like is hardly my fault. You say your are not sexist - well, most would think your comments extremely sexist, and I am not trying to shame you into scilence - but if you feel that way, then it would seem that i have rather hit the nail on the head. As for being a realist -no, your not, I have never come across the attitudes you describe

6ame Says:

Nov 7, 2009 - I don't feel ashamed, you're attempts are too pathetic for that. Calling me sexist is the classic shaming tactic whenever anything slightly negative is said about women, not the first time it's been done, won't be the last, because people like yourself tend to take the easy road, and it's a lot easier to accuse people of having problems so as to change the subject, than it is to face facts.

samsagitarias Says:

Nov 7, 2009 - If you say so - LOL I am, a little to long in the tooth to care, besides i thought that we were just having a simple and lively discussion - however, I dont know where on earth you get the idea that I am trying to shame you as you put it - its you that seems to keep harping on about it - and i am not accusing you of having problems - you are the one who mentioned that - not myself and its nothing to do with this topic of conversation -especially as , this disccussion is not about you,

6ame Says:

Nov 8, 2009 - "i am not accusing you of having problems" You said I was sexist, to me, that would be a problem, you must surely agree with this. I'm not of course, you just took the easy path, but if I was, it would be a problem.

samsagitarias Says:

Nov 8, 2009 - Easy path ? what, because i say something that you disagree with the only thing you can come back at with me is that ? Being a sexist is not a problem unless you view it as one - its merely a persons particular point of view on how they percieve things - and i dont have a problem with that, not at all , but to come out with that poor excuse for not liking my opinion rather than perhaps exploring the topic, is - to use your own analogy "pathetic" .

kaulpelly Says:

Nov 19, 2009 - Shut the fuck up the two of you. Jesus christ. It's a fuckin Billy Connolly clip not a sexist debate.

samsagitarias Says:

Nov 19, 2009 - oooo temper temper. lol

Augur Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - Sexism, like racism and elitism are good things. They force humanity to continue to compete and become better.

coldoptfc27 Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - anyone offended by this is an idiot