Wittgenstein: Philosophical discussion in Cambridge - Part 1

Pedronology Says:

Sep 23, 2009 - Just reading through some comments here, Fanfardon seems like a typical YouTube pain in the ass. Sure there are frauds/phoneys and there are people who get it. The people who get it know that all teachers are standing on the shoulders of other teachers. And the people who don't get it, think there's nothing to get, and think most people, especially celebtrated people, are phoneys. Kinda like a grumpy teenager that didn't die or move along to the next perception from the infinite.

SeanNaNaNa Says:

Sep 26, 2009 - cheers pedronology. can i copy and paste this on every youtube page?

vinceism1 Says:

Sep 29, 2009 - linguistics defeats philosophy...and temper beats professor wittgenstein...shash...

sigmareite Says:

Oct 2, 2009 - thats alfred from batman

Fanfardon Says:

Oct 3, 2009 - U lamebrained dik. U no nothing about teecherz. A teacher despises almost all who came before. He wants to wreck the established structures. Be a man for once ok and stop masturbating. Be a man and have the balz to say that Wittgenstein was a coolie. A mental coalbearer. He was just rehashing what Schopenhauer spouted. But in a far less articulate way as well as plagiarizing from Tolstoy. My teachers were Nobelistas. And I fart on them. Get some balz and stop being a little koksuking nitwit.

Pedronology Says:

Oct 4, 2009 - OK Fanfard i'll try my best, i'm sorry i've no balls and some day i'm gonna stop masturbating and make love to a real woman. In the mean time you're getting all worked up about something that's human nature. Everyone builds on the past who cares. Who cares who said what first and who said it best, its the ideas behind all that shitre talkm that are worth singing about and my teachers were gardeners and alcholics

Fanfardon Says:

Oct 5, 2009 - Now you are getting my old boy. I am glad you have some spark in you.

tariq101 Says:

Oct 7, 2009 - he said queer.

Fanfardon Says:

Oct 7, 2009 - Fik the lot of u!

mjufpn Says:

Oct 15, 2009 - gazela fast gazela tasty, croc bad, hippo not easy. hahahahahaahahahaha

inducedcollapse Says:

Nov 3, 2009 - gibberish.

alistairproductions Says:

Nov 3, 2009 - i really dont know what he was on about but i enjoyed it

SeePatPlay Says:

Nov 6, 2009 - "If we cant speak of doubt here, we cant speak of knowledge either!!" simple and beautiful.. :)

watashiwanachodes Says:

Nov 8, 2009 - wow ure a fluent lion speaker

watashiwanachodes Says:

Nov 8, 2009 - the words of a teenager... a nietzche reader.. barely... prove it on a dissertation or your words are just childlish pedantry, a mere postmodern. ive read all of those and i see not one similarity between neither schopenhauer, tolstoy nor wittgenstein whatsoever...

Fanfardon Says:

Nov 10, 2009 - No dissertation needed. Nietsche was a compulsive masturbator, pseudo-musicologist, and syphillitic pedophile. I have read all the great books and fucked all the great pussies of my generation. Reading Nitsh I find him to be at about the level of my 2nd year students---the shitty ones. It is the mark of a farte-filled intellect to like Nitsh as well as Hegel. Heidegger is an even lower shitweaver. U love to read long lines of crap and think it is profound. Usually your type are reprobates.

carusggg Says:

Nov 12, 2009 - indeed , many things they are saying just give the illusion it is something profound there; they don't say anything about the real world or anything like that and therefore i don't know why we should name them philosophers.

watashiwanachodes Says:

Nov 13, 2009 - So you do understand when i called you a "nietzsche reader".. i do not see how u got to the conclusion that i like Hegel and Heidegger... I despise Heidegger (never read more than 10 pages of his) and give little credit to Hegel...and i do not like your long lines of crap i dont think its profound... carnap proved little martin's scam up. Im not a student i did past my tests and got my masters years ago... Anything else you wanna call me mr. mad postmodern?

Fanfardon Says:

Nov 13, 2009 - Everything Witt talked about was formulated by Shannon in 1947 in his information theory article. Witt is just saying that because of different semantics at either end of the pipe some agents will never be able to understand each other. Like describing color to a blind man. Uh. OK. So what is so frikken brilliant about that? Witt was famous because he was immensely rich (a billionaire) and vigorously sodomized most of Cambridge. Only idiots can think there is anything to this fraud.

manwaring Says:

Nov 16, 2009 - I can't tell if Fanfardon is serious or a troll, he seems too educated on the subject for a troll, but unless he's some bipolar maniac I can't imagine him surviving highschool, much less university. I think they need to block off internet from mental insitutes.

UCIBME Says:

Nov 19, 2009 - What is the purpose of using language? That is what he was trying to answer. But in order to solve it, he had to explore what the hell language is actually good for. He thought he got it down in the Tractatus, but later realized there's no formal logic (i.e. order) that can be applied to language usage - a false assumption that has lasted in philosophy since the Greeks (thank you Socrates). THAT'S why people think he's the shit.

UCIBME Says:

Nov 19, 2009 - So basically, the whole discipline of Analytical Philosophy, with its premise on scrutinizing the meaning of words to help reveal more of the truth, was obviated (or resolved if you prefer) by Wittgenstein. You can analyze the word "penis" all you want, but it's nonsense, because it represents different things to different people. The fact there are still analytical philosophers in existence is evidence that no one really understands Wittgenstein.

Fanfardon Says:

Nov 19, 2009 - Analytic philosopher = intellectual bullfarter is the basic equation to emerge from Witt's work. I can't believe that sixty years after Shannon's paper on information theory this pack of idiots continues to fart around in their mental bubble. Learn some math you fikheads!

hurin6 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - Fanfardon sounds like a spiteful kid who failed to finish a philosophy major. (lol philosophy). a. You can't explain to someone the lack of meaning in a color word 'red' by substituting it with the thought that you could be seeing 'green' (since you have failed to define green in this case as well).

hurin6 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - b. Shannon's article and information theory never touch upon the problems at hand. Spoken Language is not analogous to programming language. You have to be a complete idiot to be unable to tell the difference. P.S. The guy lives in a basement and gets hard from people giving attention to his moronic remarks (as apparently this is the one thing he can do with his worthless life). So stop feeding him. Maybe one day he'll go outside and make a friend.