How Do We Know that Christians Should Ignore GIIVideo?

Laurence000001 Says:

Apr 4, 2009 - "the one who governs the earth and its people" My main criticism for theism, is this point. Does God really have any influence over us? I find it incredibly convenient that God can only communicate with Christians through prayer, and how his miracles can always be attributed to something else. Is there any other evidence that he still exists?

yoops Says:

Apr 5, 2009 - In religion everything is so convenient. They have an answer for everything, and it doesn't matter if that answer is complete nonsense, as long as they have something to rationalize with.

bangNL94 Says:

May 9, 2009 - its Gii not G2... but his vids are right, theyre totally logical and rational

OreoVII Says:

Jun 6, 2009 - It's "G-I-I" (Golf, India, India), so, most likely the I's are roman numeral meaning '2'. Like the 'VII' at the end of my name. It's roman numeral for '7'. If you think about it, who would name themselves with capital letters, that aren't roman numerals, at the end of there name instead of numbers or words? I do agree with you about your point though.

bangNL94 Says:

Jun 7, 2009 - no you dumb, G I I stand for God Is Imaginary, like his channel page says.

OreoVII Says:

Jun 7, 2009 - Hmmm, perhaps you're right about that, but did you really have to call me dumb? I attempted to prove my point by using factual truth's and you call that dumb? Don't bother calling people dumb if you can't even say it right... Regardless, I'm pretty sure even GII pronounces it 'G2' and tries to make it look like roman numerals and pronounces it G2. Which one sounds dumber to say: Gee-two or Gee-eye-eye?

OreoVII Says:

Jun 7, 2009 - Oh, I understand now. You're 14. That explains why you're such a little prick that can't type and calls people names unwarranted. I remember that phase... enjoy it! You'll feel like a douche bag later for how you treated others! Trust me...

bangNL94 Says:

Jun 9, 2009 - ok I might not have called you that... -.- I'm from Holland, I'm not a pro at English, what do you think? If you're so angry you better stay friendly, like me, or you look more like a douchebag then me.

OreoVII Says:

Jun 9, 2009 - No, the person that looks like a douchebag is the one who uses an insult first. I was informing you, and you called me an idiot. It's okay though, you're young. I was a douchebag back then, too. Soon you'll learn etiquette and you'll be more respectful towards other peoples views. But for now, your hormones don't really allow you to be a nice person. It's the curse of being a teenager.

bangNL94 Says:

Jun 10, 2009 - ehm, yeah, for sure

JupiterJazzjaa2 Says:

Jun 28, 2009 - No, dumbasses. GII stands for God Is Imaginary. You can actually just ignore it because you aren't intelligent enough to get it. You're not the kind of people we want to on the atheist side. Please continue being ignorant.

shreddez Says:

Jun 30, 2009 - hogwash. you lose.

megamanium Says:

Jul 2, 2009 - Neutrality does NOT mean assuming something has a 50/50 chance of being true. YOUR pressuposition is blatant.

aoishounen Says:

Jul 10, 2009 - And this is why I'm agnostic... Nobody has a straight answer.

tempemonkey2323 Says:

Aug 19, 2009 - telemantors, you seem like you might have been a smart person, if religion didnt scare the crap out of you so bad.... Its ok to doubt, there is no hell... Its ieasy. GIIvideo is showing that the structure and basic justification for belief is similiar with christians mormons and muslims. Its all the same crap!! Stop trying to act all sophisticated and philosophical. To properly rebuttle GIIVideo, you MUST show how christian belief differs from the other beliefs.

supercow749 Says:

Aug 27, 2009 - Using big words doesn't prove the argument. You can say what you, I strongly believe in freedom of speech, but I also believe you are a complete dumb ass.

Sophiethefembot Says:

Sep 29, 2009 - When you are a christian you are secure in what God says about you and therefore couldn't care less if somene calls you a dumbass. Just thought I'd point that out and save you the trouble of name calling next time.

posttenebraslux100 Says:

Oct 2, 2009 - He has actually done this tempemonkey2323. Check out the information that he has given in the description. History, Philosophy, and yes, even science rightly done, support the validity of the Bible.

Ichthus91 Says:

Oct 8, 2009 - GII's video was so ridiculous. The fact you responded in such a proper rational manner deserves recognition. Take joy in knowing what virtues you've done.

Mokkarev Says:

Oct 12, 2009 - The reason christians don't throw themselves from bridges and buildings (Which they do as suicude rates are consistent in all of society) is because they have the supersticious fear of hell. If you have a shitty life and want to go to heaven you have to endure all the crap because else you face the risk of hell. Can this be labeled as anything other than pure evil?

Elitehunter34 Says:

Oct 25, 2009 - What the hell, naturalists use personal experience for evidence? No they don't, if by naturalist, you mean someone who uses science to evaluate claims, then no they DO NOT use personal experience to evaluate claims. Personal experience is not evidence in the realm of science.

Elitehunter34 Says:

Oct 25, 2009 - Ok, while you do make some valid points with this video, I really have to disagree with another statement. There is scientific evidence for God's existence? Are you kidding me? Your not gonna find many people, including Christians, agree with that. There is no SCIENTIFIC evidence for God's existence.

weeweepoopoohead Says:

Nov 5, 2009 - yeah its my understanding that tangible evidence of the existance of god would devalue faith and without faith god is nothing. So there cannot be any physical evidence for the exisatnce of god, if you believe in god. So u cannot prove he exists anyway. So it is what you then decide yourself, that provides the justification of your believe in god, not physical evidence. The crux of the matter is, is the bible the literal word of god, well its a small jump to look and see all the seperate

weeweepoopoohead Says:

Nov 5, 2009 - books and determine that they were all written by seperate men in the same faith structure, or that they wrote it as directed at god (why he wudnt get it over and done with in go like he did with muhammad is beyond me but hey ho). This decision boils down to whether you believe that supernatural events can occur. So here science steps in you either believe that all events can be explained by the laws of science, or that some events occur that do not follow these laws. As a rational man I

weeweepoopoohead Says:

Nov 5, 2009 - conclude that there are no events that have ever occured that have not been explained by the laws of science. So therefore the bible stories must be written by men. But if you choose to believe in the irrational then god directed the bible to the prophets and the apostles, but once this irrational door is open wat else comes through why is the bible true yet shaman eating magic mushrooms, and invoking animal healing spirits unture, when they take the same irrational step into the supernatural