Building Stonehenge - This Man can Move Anything

emeraldsunsets Says:

Nov 12, 2009 - Plus you have to realize that land is ever changing, just because it is grassy now, doesn't mean it was grassy thousands of years ago

kurtnelle Says:

Nov 14, 2009 - It's grassy and marshy now. But what was it like 3000 years ago? Time has erased all evidence of how they did it

captainTubes Says:

Nov 15, 2009 - Just use a stone large enough to sink part way into the ground and still provide a fulcrum. No flat concrete needed.

KashAfeqs Says:

Nov 16, 2009 - Not to mention if you were to quarry a stone block like that from the ground. Not using quick dry cement concrete.

elcielo1981 Says:

Nov 18, 2009 - how did he get the block on that thing that lifts it. It was already there

fleemanson Says:

Nov 18, 2009 - Its a fucking disgrace that they charge you to look there. Its a part of our heritage.

ryansas Says:

Nov 18, 2009 - @4G0DIZS0REAL its RETARDED

JonDeth Says:

Nov 19, 2009 - Very clever and impressive but, I think he's wrong.

ardeth5 Says:

Nov 19, 2009 - There are several questions that need to be answered. 1 How did he get that big block there in the first place? 2 How did he get the stone up on the wooden thing? 3 And how would he do to put a long, heavy block on top of two other blocks?

WeCanAllGetAllong Says:

Nov 19, 2009 - Stonehendge reloaded,,... amazing potential there.

AvantGardeMakeup Says:

Nov 19, 2009 - They answered your questions 1 (pebble) 2 (teeter totter) in the video... But yeah, I would like to know how he'd did the connecting blocks on his first arch, and if he'd use the same technique for his version of Stonehenge.

ardeth5 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - But if you have a quarry, how do you get a big block from there to the grass without using modern machines? And if you have the big block on the ground, you wouldnd be able to lean it from side to side.

faisal437 Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - u guys it took 25 generation to make those and so many are wondering how did they move it and why did they make it

sharingideas Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - India had demons and giants 4000 years ago, based on their scriptures, so it would not be surprising if giants were the ones who place those rocks in the positions they are in now.

bottleofoj Says:

Nov 25, 2009 - 1 and 2 are answered in the video. 3 is he probably used the same technique as he did to get the stone up on the wooden thing

kvmusic Says:

Nov 25, 2009 - he explained that in the video. 1. he moved the block using the little rocks technique. 2. he raised the block using the teeter totter

Roseofsunshine Says:

Nov 25, 2009 - common sense and logic ....fantastic

koolaidnhemlock Says:

Nov 25, 2009 - he might be "wrong" that this was not the technique used - but it certainly is brilliant and the simplest explanation is usually the right one.

JonDeth Says:

Nov 25, 2009 - Listen, anyone that thinks he's the first person to take something heavy, balance it on a small pivot point and move it beyond what seems feasible is rather naive and uneducated. This isn't the way it was done, that I'm sure of. The technique is too unstable.

misterhype138 Says:

Nov 25, 2009 - so how was it done?

BalaclavaReturns Says:

Nov 25, 2009 - hmmm interesting hypothesis.

BalaclavaReturns Says:

Nov 25, 2009 - yeah, thats how i feel, just because he has found a way to create heavy stone structures without machines does not necessarily mean thats how stone henge or other ancient stone structures were created.

JonDeth Says:

Nov 25, 2009 - balloons

FredMcWoozy Says:

Nov 26, 2009 - I love this but...The real question of stone henge is not how did they get those blocks up but how did they get them there? I understand getting them up is also a huge feet so bravo.

xdreamdesignx Says:

Nov 26, 2009 - smart man :)