The Simpsons - Homer Evolution

bjam89 Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - were=human in my mind *smiles* and i never saw the were part, and why do you think i was duped? i have spent 19 years wondering what my faith is, i belive in evelution and a god or more gods, stillnot sure on the number,i belive in alien life, maybe not grays and that stuff but life on other plantes yes, i belive in panspermia, i belive that ailiens visited the egyptions and learnd stuff from them and i belive that peoples are not the smartest race on this planet

lastdaysguitar Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - @bjam89 If you believe evolution - you were duped.

goblinboy26 Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - why has nearly every video on you tube turned into a massive critical debate, as that other guy said noones gonna convice each other of anything, so shut your mouths and enjoy the video! GEEEZ

herecomesmightymouse Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - who created that creator?

elfy99803 Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - thats an invalid question b/c that requires time, and albert einstein showed space and time are related to each other and according to the big bang theory, space was smaller than an atom first, therefor no space means no time, so outside of space there is no time where God exists, creation requires time but since God exists out of time or space he has to creation time and has no beginning nor end. ;]

rossrosstom Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - The Simpsons S21E06 Pranks and Greens Full Episode now on w w w . doesthatwork . co . uk

herecomesmightymouse Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - typical cop out answer. "Its beyond our understanding." or "Its beyond our universe." there is just as much proof that the Christian god exists as there is that the Hindu god exists and all the other gods throughout history.

herecomesmightymouse Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - theres an invisible tea kettle thats flying around the solar system too. you can't see it or feel it but its there! i can show you documented accounts about it! why would somebody lie about something like that!

MrAbolitionistVegan Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - Lisa the herbivore, of course lol

qaramelOoqOre Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - jajaja that it was so nice !

psychokitty93 Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - Very cool :)

Codjr Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - Such a great show

JennyFarlopez Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - Don't you realize how stupid your points are? Why does the fact you barely understand anything about chemistry, biochemistry or mathematical modelling doesn't keep you from denying all those disciplines? It's like if I visited a doctor and insulted his job without knowing anything about medicine; both pathetic and stupid. By the way, do you even know how chlorophile (you spell it wrong twice) works? Do you know how many working variants of the molecule are there?

JennyFarlopez Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - This is basic biology. It's like if you had never read an elemental biology textbook... oh, wait, probably you haven't. Then I don't understand how do you feel entitled to "debate" anything, if even a 12 year old with some brains can answer you questions. Animals were heterotrophes long before they became multicellular. They fed (as most animals still do) on unicellular organisms.

Jerkix Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - What if the universe before our universe existed outside of time and space? Well it does.. because I said so.

lastdaysguitar Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - @JennyFarlopez That's the problem Jenny, real science shows your local school textbook is in error. For example - how do you account for DNA helix? DNA is the most advanced coding signal storage/management system known to man - lightyears ahead of the best nanotechnology supercomputers in efficency and performance per cm^2 Yet you claim this highly advanced intelligence technology popped into existance on it's own through what even Dawkins calls a "mechanism" of natural selection.

lastdaysguitar Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - @JennyFarlopez Your going to have to come up with a more convincing arguement than: "look, look, it's here in the textbook!" With that logic I'd be looking for "alien wolfchildren" according to National Enquirer! You evolution books are wrong, and are built upon a foundation of both intentional and unresearched multi-generational lies.

lastdaysguitar Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - @Jerkix Multiverse explaination is another well known possability, should be studied as an alternative to discern it's plausability, but that is my point exactly - atheism is CENSORING acedemia in regards to ID! They entertain every notion no matter how implausible EXCEPT the possability there really IS a God who created the universe. Several leading scientists have found evidence that points to intelligent design this effort of science should not be stifled just to sooth non believers.

lastdaysguitar Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - Former Evolutionist, Dr. Arthur Wilder-Smith contended the Evolution model did not fit the established facts of science as did the Creation model of intelligent design. "The Evolutionary model says that it is not necessary to assume the existence of anything, besides matter and energy, to produce life. That proposition is unscientific. We know perfectly well that if you leave matter to itself, it does not organize itself - in spite of all the efforts in recent years to prove that it does."

lastdaysguitar Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - Richard Milton summarized current world situation: "Darwinism has never had much appeal for science, has never appealed much to the public. Its ascendancy in science, in both Britain and America, has been waning for several decades as its grip has weakened in successive areas: geology; paleontology; embryology; comparative anatomy. Now even geneticists are beginning to have doubts. It is only in mainstream molecular biology and zoology that Darwinism retains serious enthusiastic supporters.

lastdaysguitar Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - There is a design complexity so great in life that numerous basic parts must be simultaneously present for an organism to live and function. There is an intelligent language, which we are beginning to learn, within the DNA molecule that indicates the even greater intelligence of a designer. Probabilities for correct protein sequences by random processes are essentially zero. Such topics are addressed in the new book "In Six Days: Why 50 Scientists Choose to Believe in Creation."

JennyFarlopez Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - It's not an argument. It's common sense. If you don't even know the basics of something then arguing with you is a simple waste of time, and you're also a pathetic idiot for thinking your babbling is remotely meaningful. Go back to third grade and learn the basics. Maybe then we'll have something to talk about.

FreakishBeanxxx Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - W-T FUCK ARE ALL THESE BULLSHIT COMMENTS. PEOPLE WHO CARES THIS IS A FUCKING SIMPSONS VIDEO AND YOUR ARGUING OVER THEORYS FOR FUCK SAKES. people these days.

BloodySerpent Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - Isn't it great how the Simpsons brings people together like this?

grits011 Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - Yeah, thanks a lot for the intrusive advertisement. I know what hulu is, thank you.