McCain's Mansions

selfsenter Says:

Jun 21, 2009 - i hope this housing problem has been solved or at least some sort of assistance has been given for those people. but anyways this video is not asking mcain to give up anything for the people like some posters added its just an anti-mcain advertisement. And 2nd the government is supposed to have the peoples backs , even if they were irresponsible ,, its your own people suffering here and they care to protect a handfull companies instead of millions of people. fucked up selfish system.

selfsenter Says:

Jun 21, 2009 - Theres countries with limited land that entitle every working local to a strip of land after an application process and here one of the biggest countries in the world geographically is kicking people out of homes lol god help you america cause your government isnt. and fuck u if u think people should work to own land on their homeland by default. Its a right as a human born on his homeland to have somewhere to sleep. That other fucked up mentality is corporate america talking.

DAMIANAndrews7409 Says:

Jun 29, 2009 - h0t busty brunette gets tittyfcked - VIDEOPORNTEEN[.]COM

DarkLady1313 Says:

Aug 19, 2009 - he has ten fucking houses like that?! Screw you McCain! Live in a real house and give that that extra money to ppl who really need it!!!

killbillrules Says:

Aug 25, 2009 - lol i h8 u gays

seemeinHD Says:

Aug 30, 2009 - hahaha the porn spam comment gets 5 thumbs up, yet the dude talking about gates and buffet gets a thumbs down.

seemeinHD Says:

Aug 30, 2009 - but then again think about how rich the kennedys' were, and still are...

crayzeeboy03 Says:

Aug 31, 2009 - So basically what some of you are saying is that McCain should be demonized for his financial success. Why in the hell should he give hand outs. He came into this world with nothing just like the rest of us. He has earned everything he has and everyone is capable of wealth. Most just dont have the discipline or maturity to make the initial sacrifices to ensure it. Where do people get this sense of entitlement. People need to quit living outside their means and leverage themselves.

RockaDJ Says:

Sep 8, 2009 - this is bloody awful, why is it human nature to deteste people whove had more success than them ? i just don't understand it, so unecessary...

strangemanwalking Says:

Sep 24, 2009 - They are showing that he does not know what it is like cause he is loaded. He also was born into a rich family?

ARBuilder1776 Says:

Oct 4, 2009 - Its not their success its the fact they are telling others to go without and the fact that they pretend to understand. Obama's no better. They are all elitist scum.

RockaDJ Says:

Oct 4, 2009 - how are they elitist scum? there's still a class system in the world, i believe that i'm middle class, am I elitist scum? Is everyone above the working class elitist simply because we may earn or (financially) be worth more than another?

SupermarketsRevil Says:

Oct 15, 2009 - Because they make money at the expense of others

SupermarketsRevil Says:

Oct 15, 2009 - I agree

agentgooner007 Says:

Oct 16, 2009 - "more success than them"? you mean marrying a rich woman. If you are really middle class (99% of self professed "middle class" are really only upper working class) you are only working class to the "elite scum" and the true "working class" are there as a reminder to you and make sure you do as your told (or down the ladder you go) "bitch".

DrEyeSpy Says:

Oct 19, 2009 - Elitists are the people which have unparalleled power in deciding the size of the sphere of freedom the non-elitists have. It also just so happens that they all have a mass of wealth behind them. You may need to review the word 'Elitist'. The scum part is derived from the fact that wealth can only accrued at the expense of someone else. Money would have no value if it universally abundant, it can only retain value if it is a coveted medium, which can only be if the majority are without. THINK!

DrEyeSpy Says:

Oct 19, 2009 - You obviously did not watch the entire video or pay heed to the words of the woman talking.

ryanjmcgowan Says:

Oct 25, 2009 - She got an interest only loan as her primary mortgage and that's not irresponsible how?

ryanjmcgowan Says:

Oct 25, 2009 - Money can be derived at the benefit of both. Your claim is absurd. If I ask you to bake a cake, I pay you your expenses and a profit, then I sell the cake at store for a bit more profit, we all made money and someone traded theirs for a cake they wanted more than the money. This is how all business works. And money can only have value if it grows at a pace, otherwise it gets absorbed by waste and depreciation. You know virtually of economics.

DrEyeSpy Says:

Oct 26, 2009 - No, the value of money perpetually decreases, hence inflation. The reason the value decreases is because there is a deficit it the amount of money in existence as to what is owed. Thanks to profiteering and usury. If every person were to have an equal abundance of wealth that would incur hyperinflation. Furthermore, your hypothesis only tackles to demographic which has wealth, those without the medium covet it, and exert for it, giving it value. Commodities of paucity generate illusory value.

ryanjmcgowan Says:

Oct 31, 2009 - Inflation and money being derived for the benefit of both parties are not mutually exclusive. We have inflation, but we also have wealth being generated by the production of goods from labor. Money has less value, but there is more of it every minute because of production. I was addressing your statement "wealth can only accrued at the expense of someone else." I'm not sure your last comments really argued the point I was making.

hyperbully Says:

Nov 4, 2009 - Damn, I lose stuff in my one and only house. I would HATE to have to try to remember which of my 10 houses I left my favorite pair of shoes in.

dog64 Says:

Nov 15, 2009 - Now that Obama is in, no one is losing their house.

cajunpballer Says:

Nov 15, 2009 - I hope that was sarcastic.. otherwise you have been severely misinformed.

dog64 Says:

Nov 15, 2009 - @cajunpballer LOL