George Carlin - Saving the Planet

alx90x Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - no, no no.... there was NEVER a scientific consensus that the world was flat. the greeks, hundreds of years before jesus, not only realized the earth was round, but calculated its circumference w/stunning accuracy. science has been wrong, and will be again, but not usually when there is this much support and evidence. a consensus doesnt make it true, but it sure as hell makes it more likely, esp in science.

KukriMesser Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - I nominate the hackers of the CRU email, and data archives for person/s of the year. Thank God we have people willing to put their ass on the line to spread the truth about the GW movement.

Seoshinawi Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - You know he was an atheist? That bashed religion in all its forms =) Would a "god" create someone who turned against him/her and denied it's existence, even if he spoke the truth? I dont think so

pigwax1 Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - The point is a consensus, just because you get a group to agree on something doesn't make it so. Science is or it isn't, you cant be a little pregnant. If there can be thousands of credible scientists that disagree then it isn't settled. There are plenty of reasons to doubt the motives and methods of the global warmers for arriving at their conclusions. The climate is very complex and they cant predict weather with 100% accuracy now , dont tell me they can predict what it will be in 50- 100 yrs

pigwax1 Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - Be my guest go along with them, hand over your life, money, liberty and whatever else they will want to take from you. You have drank the Koolade hey, thats cool if you want to but i'll take my chances. I trust myself more then some politically motivated science experiment that has questionable issues from others in the same field. This is a way to tax and control the population of the world, if you cannot see that your the fool.

pigwax1 Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - Its obvious you have not educated yourself with facts from BOTH sides, Thats like ONLY listening to the defense attorney at a murder trial who says his client didn't do it and is really a boy scout. So you acquit.

ausrusland Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - One of the greatest people to ever walk the planet.

trixie10121 Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - Want to hear the worst song ever recorded come to my page

SatiricalTruth Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - This guy level of intelligence is beyond 99.9% of the people in the world.

ZachValkyrie Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - Thanks for being here for a little while, George.

Hazn Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - I don't think it's as much intelligence as it is logic. George was so down to earth that he saw through all the lies. But it definetly takes soe brains too

kidrock119 Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - whats amazing is that George did this bit in 1991 and it's now 2009 and we still have morons crying about saving the planet.

Sutskoen Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - he was so describing AIDS from 6:30, that sneaky bastard

foreverremain Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - I don't think it counts as "sneaky" if he's clearly and obviously talking about AIDS.

khosrok Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - @Sutskoen He said "HIV" .. how is that Sneaky?

Sutskoen Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - by my poor attention, appearantly, seeing how I listened 3 times and missed it, I guess *hides in shame*

Sutskoen Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - I see why now, he didn't abbreviate it... guess that shows how stuck in patterns you can be

hyperseauton Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - Species extintion is much higher due to antropogentic factors compared to if we leave these factors out of the model. Carlin simply did not keep up with the science.

alx90x Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - thank you. well said. carlin was smart and insightful, but not a scientist

alx90x Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - there will never be a consensus, you will always have people who disagree. there are biologists with phd's from harvard who dont believe in evolution. there are virologists who dont believe in AIDS. what r we supposed 2 do? wait for them to catch up? and btw, Carlin was VERY liberal. he hated conservatives. In fact, ive heard interviews where he practically spews marxism. not that theres anything wrong with that.

alx90x Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - and, there are practicly no credible scientists who disagree w/climate change. 97% of climatologists with phds agree. thats a huge consensus. i define "credible" as anyone who has studied the field. if i want legit info on climate change, id ask a climatologist. if i wanted a good opinion on magic, id ask a magician. credible sources agree on climate change

pigwax1 Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - 97%? where do those numbers come from? How is it calculated? talk is cheep back it up! This is another clever tacit the left loves to use, quoting fictitious numbers to try to shore up their hoax. Examples: "The rain forest is disappearing in the amount of a football field a second" False. "The polar bears are in danger"False. im from Alaska There are more polar bears now then ever. I could go on, but its all Blah, Blah, Blah Bullshit

RtistNUtube Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - Whilst i would hate to try to define anyone by their political views , after reading a lot of his work i would dare say his political stand would lean more towards anarchist than marxist , which does make sense as anarchism is much closer to the natural state of human beings.

Panosl Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - Evidently by your eloquent use of language and grammar I can tell that you're a fucking moron who missed my completely missed my point. So, yes you've proved that you're an idiot. Thanks.

KukriMesser Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - LOL. Man you sure are dialed in to some greater wisdom about all things. I like how you go on and on too. like you've got a point that is almost believable but you just have to throw in a few more token tads of juicy information like "there are practicly no credible scientists" who don't believe in AGW. If this were a court, your case would have been tossed already on the grounds that you have offered little more than your own personal opinions to make your case, Give it a rest.