David Bowie - The Man Who Sold The World

smartass2st Says:

Oct 17, 2009 - I did a cover of this song using split screen. I play both parts of guitar and sing. Its pretty good, in my opinion that is. lol

superpriestess Says:

Oct 23, 2009 - This is just a good song. Period. David Bowie made it possible tho, so no one should forget that. He's a fucking god.

elesvette Says:

Oct 23, 2009 - woahhh wtf. in his pic he has one small pupil and one fcking huge one..wtf? lol. personally i like nirvanas version better. bowie even admitted nirvanas version was BETTER than his own.

alluurpo Says:

Oct 23, 2009 - he does actually have one normal pupil and other one is large, I heard something that he was punched in the eye when he was younger.

cc108 Says:

Oct 24, 2009 - no, he has permanent damage in one eye from when a fan threw a lolipop on stage and it hit him directly in the eye. there's pictures of it if you look it up.

madzypooandsue Says:

Oct 29, 2009 - oh em gee. I love Nirvana, like so much. But this song... David Bowie kicks ass :D Nirvana couldn't produce it like this. Its kinda gay how everyone knows the Nirvana cover and NOT the original. GO BOWIE!

jamesemajthomas Says:

Oct 29, 2009 - He had an argument with one of his friends over a girl and his friend lashed at his face and his nail caught his eyeball. He was about 18 I think so that would be the mid 1960s.

calicolombiano27 Says:

Oct 29, 2009 - no way nirvanas version is wayy better. this one is good too, obviously because its the original, but nirvana covered it epicly

omega6667 Says:

Oct 30, 2009 - We passed upon the stair We spoke of was and when Although I wasn't there He said I was his friend... inspired by? Yesterday, upon the stair, I met a man who wasnt there He wasnt there again today I wish, I wish hed go away...

willoweclipse Says:

Oct 31, 2009 - u c his i's

justinb911 Says:

Nov 2, 2009 - its a medical condition called anosocoria

alluurpo Says:

Nov 2, 2009 - I heard the same story as jamesemajthomas.

Poisonspoonful Says:

Nov 3, 2009 - Possibly because he's not a jackass? Who would allow someone to cover one of their songs then bash their cover?

younggeo95 Says:

Nov 7, 2009 - he was rollin nd he never got normal ther.! by one eyeball.!

90zosoman09 Says:

Nov 8, 2009 - I actually think this is better then Nirvanas just because its got a little more of a feeling to it.

DRUMKIND Says:

Nov 10, 2009 - nirvana covered well but the final chorus coda¡¡¡ masterpiece

manbearpig937 Says:

Nov 15, 2009 - people who block comments for being rude are just faggy little bitches btw, just putting it out in the open

manbearpig937 Says:

Nov 15, 2009 - @manbearpig937 i conquer, the fag

ClassicRockSovereign Says:

Nov 16, 2009 - That's 'epically'. Or did the Internet ruin that, too?

hemobotep Says:

Nov 17, 2009 - That's the same reason I think Nirvana's cover is better. There's a lot more feeling in the simplistic, non-saturated singing voice. This has all the elements of over-produced pop-rock. The way Kurt sings this is what made it more emotional.

MegaBear1990 Says:

Nov 17, 2009 - I thought Kurt didn't get close to singing like bowie

ClassicRockSovereign Says:

Nov 18, 2009 - 'Over-produced pop-rock'? You're thinking of My Chemical Romance. Plus, David Bowie was way more influential than Nirvana.

sindresollie Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - to bad the effects and instruments on this version fuck up the whole song. In simplicity Nirvana's version is way better.

90zosoman09 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - I dont think the effects mess it up at all. After all Nirvana never would have covered it without it being written. I like this version better because effects are always fun and honestly it could be alot weirder thats just a guitar with distortion some effects on the voice and a keyboard and some other instruments so yeah its actually not fucked up by effects.

t0ny0ngBayawak Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - no disrespect but his voice is bullshit!