Al Gore Debates Global Warming

mikie8865 Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - AUDIT THE FED!!!!!

charlienethercoat094 Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - thanks a lot im sticking qoutes from this into my essay

ghostrippa Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - ok world there it is, now who are you going to listen to, the experts... or Al Gore?

theslimeylimey Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - Al Gore of course, his chart was bigger so it must be more right. ;-) Let's hope the data from the hacked server of the research center will prove man made global warming is BS before it's too late to stop this madness.

northpal2 Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - I am still awaiting the evidence of the so called Global Warming due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). world did warm between 1975 and 1998, but even Professor David Karoly, one of our leading alarmists, admitted this week temperatures have dropped since - both in surface temperatures and in atmospheric temperatures measured from satellites.

northpal2 Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - In fact, the fall in temperatures from just 2002 has already wiped out a quarter of the warming our planet experienced last century. (Check data from Britains Hadley Centre, NASAs Aqua satellite and the US National Climatic Data Centre.)

VideoGundamXYZ Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - Dear Al Gore, IPCC, etc. CLIMATE-GATE has arrived ! The jig is up ! Time to pay the piper !

gonavy505 Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - Blah....blah....blah....Man Bear Pig does not exist.

gonavy505 Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - Al Bore also recently said the earth's core is "Millions of degrees Fahrenheit"! Do you believe him there too? LMAO

BeondaPale Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - See, there's your problem north old pal. When clowns like you make statements like 2002 wiped out a quarter of the warming of the last century, attempting to ONE YEAR as iron clad evidence of the non-existance of an OBVIOUS OBVIOUS climatic trend, it's really no wonder why only total morons take you seriously Such a statement would be LAUGHED AT by actual scientists.

vanderbilt887 Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - You're completely right BeondaPale. I am sick and tired of these denial idiots who spam youtube and the blogosphere these days. Everyone thinks he's a freaking expert on everything nowadays. The sheer stupidity! They don't even take a look at the actual science!

zenhemmo Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - Denial presupposes existance. There is no empirical evidence to claim that humans have had any effect on global climate. And I wouldn't count on Al Gore either. After all, he's not a scientist and he has invested over $100,000,000 in all sorts of companies building upon the global warming fuss. It's quite obvious that the global warming is a religion-like movement.

vanderbilt887 Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - "There is no empircal evidence" Completely ignorant of the climate science done, the evidence is overwhelming. Read the studies done, read the IPCC reports, including the just released Copenhagen Diagnosis. I don't count on Gore, I count on science and evidence. The fact that you can't distinguish between religion and scientific evidence is only your own personal tragedy.

zenhemmo Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - If the evidence is overwhelming then how come no one has been able to prove that the current alleged warming deviates from Earth's normal cooling and warming cycle? And as it has been said on numerous occasions, the IPCC is not a scientific body but a political one. We have temperature readings going back to the 1600s, satellite data, polar ice fluctuation data - none of which suggest that there is something out of the ordinary happening in global climate.

vanderbilt887 Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - Current changes can't be part of a natural cycle, as no natural cause has been identified. There is no climatological theory in which CO2 does not drive temperature. And natural cycle precedents do not exhibit the same extreme changes we're now witnessing. The Dansgaard-Oeschger events are localized to the northern hemisphere and accompanied with cooling in the southern hemisphere. In contrast, current global warming is occuring in both hemispheres and particularly throughout

vanderbilt887 Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - the world's oceans, indicating a significant energy imbalance. And in spite of it being indeed mindlessly reiterated, The IPCC lead authors are experts in their field. The chapters that are prepared are charged with fairly representing the full range of the up-to-date, peer-reviewed literature. The IPCC tends to be cautious in coming to conclusions. Consequently, newest research findings are consistently leading to the IPCC concluding that climate change is occurring more rapidly and

vanderbilt887 Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - intensely than indicated by the cautious findings in its previous assessments.

Cujoh Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - here a thought, more CO2 means more plant respiration which creates more plants and food from them

northpal2 Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - Well what is the time cycle to establish a climatic trend ? When the 11 year sun spot cycle drove temperature up, it was paraded as evidence of global warming. I am still awaiting the evidence of the so called Global Warming due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). Especially interesting theory for a CARBON based planet. Which "actual scientists" are you referring to? Feeman Dyson or the 30,000 who say global warming due to humans is all hogwash.

northpal2 Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - Oh boo-hoo another little idiot who was brought up on hero worship and liberal-marxist dogma. Grow up, get a job, pay your own bills, read history. Global Warming due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is just another scam. But if you buy into it, post your receipt for the carbon credits you have paid to date. PUT YOUR MONEY WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS. Leave my wallet alone.

BeondaPale Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - 1. Time cyle to establish a climate trend? Yeah, that would be more than the single year you dishonestly pointed to earlier as evidence of a trend 2. Now YOU (a non-scientist, anonymous YouTube clown) say that temps were driven up SOLEY by sun-spot cycle - Proving once again that you are either dishonest or selectively ignorant TO THE CORE. 3. You will continue to wait for evidence, regardless of whatever evidence is presented to you, because your AGENDA mandates that you do so

BeondaPale Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - 4. LOL, as if the the fact that lifeforms on the planet earth are carbon based diminishes IN ANY WAY the basic chemical properties of CO2 -- this one is one of the more hilarious I've heard recently - thanks for the laugh 5. To what scientist am I refering? Well, that would be the scientists of EVERY SINGLE SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTION ON THE PLANET 6. Oh you mean the 30,000 in that petition that includes scientific luminaries like Elmer Fudd, Wiley Cayote, Woody Woodpecker and Hawkeye Pierce?

northpal2 Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - Hey your fuckin mother is a you-tube clown you brain washed imbecile. You have no education only parroting lips. There is NO evidence of the so called Global Warming due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). Only assumptions from flawed and massaged data. Post your carbon tax receipts. PUT YOUR MONEY WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS.

BeondaPale Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - On the one hand we have scientifically verifiable FACT on the other, your yelling, screaming and PURE BS Gee, tough choice

northpal2 Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - ok genius Post your carbon tax receipts. PUT YOUR MONEY WHERE YOUR MOUTH IS. or are you alarmist like the Jewish rebels on Mount Masada. You want everyone to agree on mass suicide but you want to go last.