Cameron and Comfort dissing Darwin

freakyphysicsguy Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - That last one is ironic since Heisenberg would've been their best chance at winning the war if he had fully supported the Nazis. After the war American scientists found his work on the Atomic Bomb and found numerous errors that seemed just a little too deliberate to have happened "genuinely".

sonic8005 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - Hitler wasn't on Comfort's side... Hitler preferred killing the opposition and people he didn't like. Comfort prefers the pretending to love them when he disapproves of them for reasons he doesn't understand. The only things the two have in common are similar beliefs, similar acceptances and understandings of evolution ("zilch" counts too) and, similarly made hand gestures when they preach about topics they feel strongly about. Unfortunately, I can't say Comfort wouldn't kill with an army....

timsn274 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - Notice that they are saying that the official Party religion is Christianity. This refutes your own point.

timsn274 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - The term 'tail' was for the delicate at the time. Bible commentators indicate that it referred to the penis of an elephant.

laack Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - Congratulations on - as always - a job well done.

timsn274 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - What about Rolls-Royce? Some of them are on the road after 70 years.

timsn274 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - Which doesn't explain the total lack of pollen in the lower levels, nor how you get 'hydrodynamic sorting', which is a product of calm laminar flow, in the turbulence of 1000 foot waves and high winds.

jlambertstl Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - If an atheist did to the bible what comfort did to Origin, there would be a lynch mob.

timsn274 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - Trying to defend Young Earth Creationism from a 'scientific' viewpoint requires denying most of science. Thus, to be honest or consistent, the technology that results, like antibiotics, electronics, and X-rays must work by 'luck'. Invoking any science at all in defense is a non-starter. If they went that route, they would be put in the 'kook' class by everyone.

bowlsallbroken Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - I'm very sorry for your loss, Aron. Once again you've released an excellent video. You should challenge RC to a debate again, maybe he'd be interested now unless TF rattled him too much when he got him to admit that he would deny evolution no matter how much evidence was brought.

QAndyRa Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - What if some of the science is incorrect, such a the dating techniques..

lennylightweight Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - This old chesnut. Do you understand isotopes?

sfg911 Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - Well, if there is something wrong.... you can prove it! Good luck.

DjGils Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - Lol! Brilliant people have been trying to disprove darwins work for 150 yrs, but comfort and cameron think they can. lol! lol! lol! lol! Isn't life briliant!

fayz08 Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - Possibly the best video on this subject I have ever seen on YouTube. Nice one!

SpyderR0de0 Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - Watch the movie zeitgeist that will shine the light on a whole bunch of things.

QAndyRa Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - Regarding what exactly?

goldgrif Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - condolences upon the loss of your father

goldgrif Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - dont try they only listen to who they want and refuse to look at all the information, I know it is hard not to try to enlighten, but after a while it is like beating your head against the wall

Onithyr Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - "Regarding what exactly?" He's offering you luck in your endeavor to discover potential errors in the dating techniques. He probably did so because you're going to need it especially given your previously demonstrated ineptitude.

Leehofooks Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - If some of the science is incorrect (and nobody can deny that it is, or else scientists would be out of a job) then use science to find evidence for it. As far as dating is concerned, though, for the Earth to be a few thousand years old rather than a few billion, EVERY dating method (and there are many) would have to be entirely wrong by an incredibly large factor.

Cade57 Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - Andy - how old do you think the earth is?

10sodot Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - what are your thoughts on Nassim Taleb's "the philosophy of randomness and the role of uncertainty in science and society" watch his debate with hitchens,harris.dennett

QAndyRa Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - 10,000 max..

QAndyRa Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - Carbon dating is notoriously unreliable. Incident regarding mount StHelens rock, 1 dated many thousands of yrs older than the other part of the rock.