The Crisis of Credit Visualized - Part 1

BrettR4763 Says:

Oct 16, 2009 - Thank you. That explains a lot.

hegemonymony Says:

Oct 17, 2009 - Funny, no mention of government policy.

BoshSpong Says:

Oct 19, 2009 - Government policy was to let the markets rule! It was a "free market" republican policy

Bukszusz Says:

Oct 22, 2009 - "What is the credit crisis?"??:))

dukee155 Says:

Oct 23, 2009 - no it was because the government did not leave the interest rates to a free markets and since interest rates are low and if the interest rates where left to a free market to decide they would have risen a long time ago

k9thru12 Says:

Oct 24, 2009 - Westerns Step Up Not China Russia or Arabs Alex Jones you were totally Right they set up Westerns with Chinese cell and then use the set up contact act to justify a DOMESTIC operation. It a Fools experiment against Westerners not foreigners. False Threats of Foreigners are been used set up Democratic Westerners. Elites help each other regardless of color? Lower level ops left in the Dark.

AProbableAnomaly Says:

Oct 26, 2009 - Basically the federal reserve socializes losses and privatizes profits for banking members. Banks risk money, when times are good they profit. When economy goes sour, no risk, and tax payers are on the hook, direct or hidden taxes like inflation etc. Bankers have access to unlimited supply of liquidity (elastic money supply), and we're all on the hook, while the banking cartel ensures profits for the banking elite. The fed can/does makes irresponsible gambles, but passes on losses, it profits

AProbableAnomaly Says:

Oct 26, 2009 - Please help support HR1207, Fed will only provide relevant information to our representatives if an Audit REQUIRES it. Our representatives have the right and responsibility to audit the Fed! The Federal Reserve supports its own expansion, resists checks and balances of Fed. (those in majority don't question it because Fed appeases with unlimited expansion of credit by risking/loaning US dollars). Jackson put on his grave he beat central bank, the Fed was always controversial, AUDIT THE FED

tuuche88 Says:

Oct 26, 2009 - does anybody know which program was used to create this animation. Can you please tell me. thanks

pwettycheriam Says:

Nov 1, 2009 - Thanks you sooooo much! you did a great job!!!! It clarified so much!!!

Necrosss2236 Says:

Nov 2, 2009 - Fuck capitalism !

mredstriumph Says:

Nov 2, 2009 - Lying sack Here r the acts deregulating securities ** ALL ** passed by Clinton Fed Housing Enterprises Financial Safety Soundness Act 92 Riegle-Neal Interstate Banking Branching Effic Act 94 Community Reinvestment Act 95 Taxpayer Relief Act 97 Gramm Leach Bliley Act 99 Commodity Futures Modernization Act 2000 Not 1 dereg law or act by Bush /watch?v=Lr1M1T2Y314 /watch?v=MswWn24p-Iw Show me Republicans lowering lending standards deregulating if u can

bluetablepainting Says:

Nov 3, 2009 - Support HR 1207, Audit the Fed! If you live in North Carolina, keep your eye close on your representative (Mett?) he's on the committe and supports the central bank.

SexxyyAmberri Says:

Nov 7, 2009 - heh feeling lonely anyone up for cam chat? ^^

TypicalCornflakes Says:

Nov 8, 2009 - on the leverage part, what would the boxes be in real terms? e.g products?

Wolfje777 Says:

Nov 14, 2009 - anything that sells...

Daski69 Says:

Nov 15, 2009 - There's one thing I don't quite understand... Let's say the lender will get 100 000$ from the family through mortgage, then the investment banker buys this mortgage, in which way does it profit any of them? If the investment banker buys the mortgage(s) for 90 000$, the lender obviously loses money. If he buys the mortgage(s) for 110 000$, will he not lose in that case? he get's 100 000$ from the families and loses 10 000$ with every purchased mortgage?

Daski69 Says:

Nov 15, 2009 - The only way I could think of that the investment banker will benefit is if he raises the interest to a percent that will give him more than the amount the mortgage did cost for him, but can he really do that?

ViewUniTy Says:

Nov 16, 2009 - ing. So take the opportunity.

KeveBeave Says:

Nov 17, 2009 - The investment banker (using your example) would buy it for 110,000. He then packages it up into smaller sales. Say he sells it in three pieces for 40,000 a piece. He then makes 10,000 total. The investors that bought the packaged mortgages now make interest basically off of the interest the home owner is paying.

Daski69 Says:

Nov 18, 2009 - So the investors that bought them can raise the interest of these "mortgage fractions"? thanks for your answer!

sibermonk Says:

Nov 18, 2009 - Great work, Mr.Jarvis, my favourite video on youtube!

PhilippValenta Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - Great video, it really hits the point. Thank you!

pshenka100 Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - The picture seems more clear now. Thanks. Now I understand why it unfluences us in Europe so much. We live in a small world .

theworldunseen Says:

Nov 25, 2009 - great