Casey Luskin of the Discovery Institute lying on the TeeVee

katzefrau84 Says:

Aug 19, 2009 - Just to say- in my Genetics, Embryology, and even BASIC zoology courses in an accredited university we have seen, and discussed at length, the lies and truths of the embryological drawings mentioned. We went over the fact that they are incorrect and "smoothed over" in many ways. This is because the basis of Science is to correct itself over and over... and not stick its fingers in its ears and go "Nya, nya, nya..."

Rockster969 Says:

Aug 21, 2009 - Anybody reckon Luskin is gay? Nothing wrong with being gay.......unless yer a fundie!

NomadSoul76 Says:

Aug 23, 2009 - Casey Luskin has been called the Discovery Institute's attack gerbil. He's revealed that he goes around googling his own name, looking for people who say unkind things about him in the web so he can send legally threatening email to these people. Unfortunately those nasty evolutionists are a little smarter than he is and rather than be cowed by the threats they just post them and reveal him to be the gutless wonder that he is.

PachucoDesigns Says:

Aug 25, 2009 - Perfectly phrased, my friend. Belongs on a t-shirt. lol

Abazigal Says:

Aug 27, 2009 - Religion: If they say the bible is mistaken, they're doing it wrong. If they try to provide evidence the bible is mistaken, they're really doing it wrong. If they don't accept that the bible is right, they're not doing it at. By religion I mean creationism, of course, not all religious beliefs, but I certainly know which one I support.

pyxlated Says:

Aug 30, 2009 - Of course we're not doing it at all. Faith has to be the single worst method of understanding reality ever conceived. Any "theory" (and I use the word more generously than is deserved) which requires faith to be believed is wrong virtually by definition.

Grospoliner Says:

Aug 31, 2009 - I'd never heard of or seen Haeckel's Emberyos before today.

andeathSWE Says:

Sep 2, 2009 - "Darwinism" lol

mattmirage Says:

Sep 3, 2009 - this gue is a deuch. fuck the bible and fuck its believers. read your fairy tales and get knowhere in life

338dmac Says:

Sep 8, 2009 - I wish that was in English, I might agree with it if it was :) jk, I'm not a grammar whore.

mattmirage Says:

Sep 8, 2009 - haha i kno. i wasn't paying attention lol

Omnywrench Says:

Sep 12, 2009 - Sweet bone-gnawing Christ, why does every single Creationist I've seen so far have such a fucking annoying voice? This guy sounds like his balls never dropped. I keep expecting him to start bawling like a toddler and crying for his mommy. It's bad enough he's an ignorant religious moron.

happyhappy85 Says:

Sep 30, 2009 - how the hell did that guy get on tv?

zoskiaist Says:

Oct 2, 2009 - you should all get rid of your TV's! i did, long ago

EarlFaulk Says:

Oct 4, 2009 - Me neither

VCat2006 Says:

Oct 6, 2009 - So Darwin was a little wrong, not completely. New Scientist should not be misleading, but i guess they can't profit enough otherwise.

VCat2006 Says:

Oct 6, 2009 - Isn't belief assumption based on lack of evidence?

VCat2006 Says:

Oct 6, 2009 - I'm not you. I like my TV. It has the amazing ability to bring far away views to me, with little effort on part of myself! It's kind of like an international network of ideas.

jhbbunch Says:

Oct 8, 2009 - Darwin knew nothing about DNA, so I don't see how he could be wrong about how prokaryotes transmit genes in a horizontal manner. It would still be evolution, the genetic transfers would make for variation in a species and the variation would be selected for or against. And from what I understand HGT does not apply to eukaryotes anyway.

PaperSoapy Says:

Oct 11, 2009 - I used watch fox news, thinking that they were the only semi-unbiased news organization out there. I now believe that all news organizations are completely dishonest, and enjoy presenting utter bullshit to the public.

Rob8036 Says:

Oct 26, 2009 - i've actually heard that flat earth argument.. i didn't know what to say.

UnknownVisions Says:

Oct 26, 2009 - Journal New Scientist? No, no, no. NS magazine is a prodominantly LAYMAN magazine, it's not a peer reviewed journal. Casey is a fucking moron.

excandersham Says:

Nov 1, 2009 - new scientist likes to post these stories on evolution and darwin as they sell copies

excandersham Says:

Nov 1, 2009 - the internet is amore unbiased source of news for me i stopped watching tv ages ago

VCat2006 Says:

Nov 2, 2009 - I generally prefer the English of TV subtitles to that of YouTube comments.