Call of Duty 3 Treyarch is better than Infinity Ward - bad05

coaxill Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - Also, in my opinion tanks ruined cod3 for the maps that had them. A tank spawns and whatever team gets it goes to the lead. It's the same problem I have with the battlefield games because if one team goes and hijacks all of the enemy vehicles then they might as well have won the round. While you are entitled to your opinion I have to ask why did WAW copy cod4 with a few changes? Maybe 100 people still play cod3 while WAW and MW2 have seemingly a million a piece. Oh, and cod3s singleplayer sucks.

coaxill Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - WAW=COD4 with more glitches and unbalanced weapon selection.

golfisgreat123 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - modern warfare 2 is even worse 1.famas at lest 4 people use it in every game 2. noobtube (gernade launcher) 3.riot sheild 4.rpg-7 tons of people just run around and shoot it at ur feet killing you everytime infinity ward sucks also you spawn 30 feet from where u die every time so u get spawn killed and why does money fly out when you kill someone makes no sence the killstreaks ruin the game ac130 spawn kill everytime till it goes away call of duty is dieing less people play it more and more

coaxill Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - I will admit that I played cod3 more than any other cod game but that's because it was my first and it wasn't until 2 years later I played cod4 and I left treyarch behind. The problem with cod3 is the specialized class system IE medic, support etc. In MW2, you can do whatever you want because the only things you have to worry about are killing, not getting killed, and defending/attacking objectives. In cod3, no one I know likes to play anti armor. A tank arrives and no one kills it-we all die.

coaxill Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - FAMAS is terrible compared to every other gun except the Vector and if you are any good at that game you can kill a FAMAS user before he can say "Fuck I need a new class" I have only seen one person per match use a noob tube but it's more balanced this time around because all the other weapons kill faster. I have only seen one rpg spammer and I play that game constantly. No one uses the riotshield because you can't get kills with it. The ac130 isn't that powerful and it only lasts for 30 seconds

coaxill Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - As for spawn killing, that happened to me way more in COD3 because of the set spawn points that don't move even if there is a guy in your fuckin base. Money flies out of enemies when you get a payback kill. Get it? Pay-back? Its not funny but at least you can get new callsigns for it. More people bought MW2 then any other call of duty game, more than halo, more than gta 4, and it broke the record more most pre-orders so I guess you are talking about just the treyarch call of dutys.

golfisgreat123 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - mw2 sold 7 million copies so far halo 3 sold 18 million treyarchs nazi zombies made for money then modern warfare 2 copies sold

coaxill Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - World at war: 3,689,620 MW2: Estimate at 6,160,000 (Console sales only) I hope you are referring to preliminary sales rather than total sales. Halo 3 sold about 1.8 million on launch. MW2 sold 2,470,380 more copies on launch than WAW.

WWII33 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - Well, once again, it's your own opinion that COD 3 campaign sucked. I liked it and COD MW's campaign, although action packed, was extremely short and after that, I didn't play another level again. COD 3's campaign actually lasted me about two-three months before I got bored with it. Also, tanks didn't ruin online. There's a class for demolition (M1898 Shotgun) and there's a rocket-projected weapon on each team (M1 Bazooka and Panzerschrek). Two hits with those and the tanks is destroyed.

WWII33 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - Also, the sniper had the ability to call in an artillery strike. And, World At War didn't copy Modern Warfare in any way (except for the engine, which I personally think Call Of Duty 3 still beats them all in graphics). It created a whole new campaign (WWII compared to Modern War), had new weapons, new story, new battles, characters, skins, and ultimately a whole new gaming experiance. Treyarch has been given a lot of flak for it's hard-work and I think they deserve more. WWII FTW...

coaxill Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - I just couldn't respect any of the characters in cod3 and call me weird but due to the mediocre voice acting, I laughed when Dixon died. He sounded less like he was dieing and more like he just got punched in the gut. This just might be me, but I never saw anyone touch the anti- tank weapons. Everyone wanted to be something else. I also hate it when you can call in an airstrike without having to work for it. WAW did copy cod4. Create-a-class, Perks, knife, attachments and kill streaks.

coaxill Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - COD3 also had a short campaign. I believe my current record is 8 hours on veteran. In contrast, I beat MW2 in 5 hours on veteran, but I went back and played it again for intel, and played it again so that I could see stuff that I may have missed, and then again because I thought it was epically awesome. I played cod3 once for the hell of beating it, and once more so that I could take the different paths. Also, the tanks didn't outright RUIN the online, it would just be better without them.

WWII33 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - @coaxill Well, yeah for multiplayer, but I was talking about singleplayer...for multiplayer, they added on Modern Warfare's concept. They created more perks, changed the killstreaks, added (once again) WWII weapons, and added tanks (although the tanks weren't has effective as in Call Of Duty 3. And, if no one wanted to be the anti-tank weapons fault, that's not Treyarch's problem. And it's the people that didn't want to be that class who are to blame if a tank keeps mowing them down.

WWII33 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - @coaxill Also, you still had to work to get that artillery strike, and it was a more realistic way of calling the artillery the the newer games. For COD3, you had to look through your binoculars and call the strike, which I thought was pretty cool. Also, you still had to work becuase I remember getting mowed down plenty of times while being a sniper because I wasn't in a safe location or they came up behind me. All I'm saying is the Call Of Duty 3 is the best Call Of Duty for console-my opinion.

WWII33 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - @coaxill Well, I just played MW2 once just for beating it too. But, really, why are we fighting over this...? I mean, we all have our different opinions on each game, don't we? You enjoyed MW2 more than COD3 and I enjoyed COD3 more than MW2. They are still both great games made by both great companies....

coaxill Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - You had to CAMP to get that artillery strike. It was more realistic than waw or cod4, but not as much as mw2. here is my list of cod game best to worst Singleplayer: MW2 COD2 COD4 COD3 COD1 CODWAW Multiplayer: MW2 COD4 CODWAW COD3 COD2 COD1

WWII33 Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - @coaxill I liked these games: Singleplayer: Call Of Duty 2 Call Of Duty 2 Big Red One Call Of Duty 3 Call Of Duty Call Of Duty United Offensive Call Of Duty Finest Hour Call Of Duty Modern Warfare 2 Call Of Duty Modern Warfare Call Of Duty World At War

coaxill Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - We are fighting because I am extremely aggressive. Treyarch revealed they were making a call of duty game to be released in last quarter 2010. Lets not forget that Treyarch made Big Red One. I shudder to think what a mess it would be if someone remade that.

coaxill Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - My biggest problem with treyarch is that they dwell on WWII while everyone else in videogame development moved on to other stuff. WWII features limited technology, patriotism so dense you couldn't cut through it with an axe, and nazis. I personally like Germans and everyone calls me a freak when I try to sympathize with them.

a1ez11 Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - what if they make a call of duty game that is set in vietnam, or the korean war, we never have had a game based on the korean war, so why not those ?? or the gulf war, {oh wait, gulf war was kinda like todays war}

liljuve13 Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - cod3 was alright cod2 was kool cod4 was beast mw2 is just the best of the best

zaspo Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - TREYARCH SUCKS

EarthPig09 Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - INFINITY WARD SUCKS!

brad04ok Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - there is no competition infinity ward all da way, mw2 best game of all time bitches

welchbob2008 Says:

Nov 25, 2009 - you guys are retarded infinity ward made call of duty literally and none of treyarch's games even won any awards. call of duty 3's multiplayer was horrible no one said it was amazing like cod4. All you guys are doing is picking out the smallest things like the colors they use, like who cares it's a game it's meant to be played not analyzed! RETARDS bet you guys have no life considering your trying to prove games that no one cares about is better than 3 games that won game of the year.