"Seven is Exploding"

unclesamnephew666 Says:

Nov 17, 2009 - 9/11 was an inside job. Doesn't everyone know that already? Even cops and firemen in NY City will tell you that. But they are ordered not to say anything and out of fear of their jobs won't say too much on camera.

PoetryHound Says:

Nov 18, 2009 - "Even cops and firemen in NY City will tell you that. But they are ordered not to say anything" How can they tell you that if they're ordered not to say anything?

unclesamnephew666 Says:

Nov 18, 2009 - You couldn't understand what I wrote PoetryHound? Thats OK I will explain it to you. The firemen are ordered not to say anything, But they still do talk about it, they just don't like talking while being videotaped because if their superiors(Bosses) see the video they might lose their jobs. PoetryHound if you have any more problems understanding what I wrote just feel free to send me a message and I will explain it to you the best way I can so even you can understand it.

PoetryHound Says:

Nov 19, 2009 - Oh, I see. They're ordered not to talk to anyone, but they go ahead and do it anyway and so they talk to complete strangers and apparently aren't worried about getting caught. Sure. Makes perfect sense. What other bullshit did you make up in your head?

KevinMerck Says:

Nov 19, 2009 - There's no question in my mind that there's enough evidence to justify a very comprehensive and hard hitting investigation of a kind that we've not seen, with subpoenas, general questioning of people, and raising the release of a lot of documents, there's no question that very serious questions have been raised, about how much they knew beforehand and how much involvement there may have been. - Daniel Ellsberg

PoetryHound Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - If you've had your fill of piece-of-shit conspiracy videos web sites that distort the truth omit inconvenient facts, here's a good site that debunks all the conspiracy claims covers everything from the structural analyses to the FDNY concerns to the stupidity about thermite charges. If you want to get beyond the garbage videos and pseudo-science, check out this site. Its full of links to academic journals, trade association magazines, other legit sources. wtc7lies. googlepages. com

Heatherinthebuff Says:

Nov 20, 2009 - If you have had your fill of hateful shill debunkers then give them a thumbs down rating. Some people actually care that 3000 people were slaughtered in a controlled demolition on 9/11.

PoetryHound Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - Don't trust anyone who makes unsupportable bullshit claims they found on Joe Blow's unaccountable conspiracy web site. I don't need the government to tell me what happened on 9/11. I don't trust them. But I trust the conspiracy fruitcakes even less. They're unintelligent, gullible kooks who swallow every talltale as long as it's about the US government.

PoetryHound Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - "trying to accuse truthers of being racists." Just pointing out the reality. Open your eyes. 9/11 conspiracy theory attracts Jew haters, Israel bashers, people who refer to Arabs as "cave dwellers," and other assorted bigots and losers. You have to remain willfully blind not to see it. No wonder your "movement" is fading. How many people showed up at the NYC rally last a few weeks ago? I heard only about 100. Nothing but losers and kooks.

PoetryHound Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - You're the one with multiple accounts and you're a deeply troubled and gullible conspiracy clown. I'll keep reposting the same thing as long as you and your multiple accounts keep voting it down. BTW, like other conspiracy kooks, you can't even read. I never mentioned "racists."

PoetryHound Says:

Nov 22, 2009 - Not surprisingly, there are a large number of Jew haters, Israel bashers, and other assorted bigots and losers among the 9/11 conspiracy kooks. With few exceptions, the whole conspiracy fantasy appeals to people who are fairly dim-witted, paranoid, and gullible. They are happily spoonfed by shitty videos and web sites and then call that "doing research." LMAO

Joefreiheit Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - JOB!

Joefreiheit Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - INSIDE

Joefreiheit Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - WAS AN

Joefreiheit Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - 9/11

KevinMerck Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - People interested in the truth don't care if the perpetrators were Jewish, Catholic, Islamist, Buddhists or atheists. People interested in the truth don't care if the perpetrators were white, black, yellow or brown. Reasonable people want justice regardless of the religious, racial makeup or national origin of the perpetrators.

PoetryZound Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - Anyone who examines the facts in a calm and rational manner will realize that the firemen who said WTC 7 was unstable were lying. I hate to say the firefighters were part of the plot, but if they were correct about the building's instability, that would undermine the whole inside job conspiracy theory and we can't have that happen.

KevinMerck Says:

Nov 23, 2009 - In the real world, any collapse of building 7 would have been a partial collapse in the direction of the damaged area. The worst case scenario for 1 and 2 would have been a partial collapse at the point of impact leaving the rest of the building standing. There is no way on God's green earth that they could have collapsed at near free-fall speed through the path of greatest resistance without the use of controlled demolition. That would be *strictly impossible*.

PoetryHound Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - In the real world, buildings collapse all different ways. I don't need an unemployed steam pipefitter like KevinJerck lecturing me about highrise structural engineering. I know, I know. That's what the conspiracy kooks do - pretend to be experts in structural engineering, experts in fire safety protection, experts in metallurgy, experts in physics, etc. Meanwhile, they claim all the folks who really ARE experts in these fields are liars. Sure. Makes perfect sense.

Joefreiheit Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - Steel structured buildings have never in history collapsed in on themselves like what happened to all 3 wtc buildings in NYCity on 9/11 unless it was a demolition job. There have been many buildings that were hit by aircraft and many buildings that have burned and none of them fell like the WTC buildings. The WTC buildings were controlled demolition jobs.

PoetryHound Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - "Steel structured buildings have never in history collapsed in on themselves" So nothing can happen if it's never happened before, eh? That's pretty stupid logic. "like what happened to all 3 wtc buildings" Did you forget the planes? Duhhhhh. Oh, what possible harm could come from fuel-laden jets used as missiles? I think the conspiracy tards are getting even dumber with time.

Joefreiheit Says:

Nov 24, 2009 - Many buildings have been hit by planes and they didnt collapse in on themselves and many buildings have burned and have never feel in on themselves like the WTC buildings did on 9/11. It is an obvious demolition job. Don't let the shills tell you otherwise.

PoetryHound Says:

Nov 25, 2009 - Buildings hit by planes have responded all sorts of ways. You're no expert on the subject, but like all kooks you pretend to be one. Many buildings have collapsed from fire. None have ever collapsed from silent, flash-free "explosives" that left no trace in the seismic record.

Joefreiheit Says:

Nov 25, 2009 - Show proof of any steel structured building collapsing straight down on itself other than the 3 WTC buildings and controlled demolition jobs. You can't. I"ve looked all over the net. I've seen buildings fall over sideways, Ive seen buildings lean, I seen buildings have partial collapse, and I have seen buildings completely engulfed with flames and still remain standing. Architects and engineers are say the same. Even demolition experts are saying it. Face it they were controlled demolitions.

PoetryHound Says:

Nov 25, 2009 - Show proof of any buildings that were detonated with silent, flash-free detonation charges that left no trace in the seismic record and were somehow planted in actively used buildings with no one noticing. You can't. The way a building falls isn't enough. You need to have evidence of explosives. And there's none. And there's no evidence of nonexistent nanothermite charges being used either.