Share Video
Download Video: Click Here (save as ***.flv) | Real Player or any FLV Player Required
Permalink:
Embed Code:
Bookmark
tedplaysguitar Says:
May 3, 2009 - My take. District Judge Stone: "You can't help yourself can you? You lack the insight to realise when you are a danger to other people. Do you realise what a danger you are to the public?" with respect I see that as anti social behavioural intent as the judge indicated his danger to the public, his act was knowingly pre mediated via no insurance. To be fair I find no problem when Staines exposes politicians indiscretions and by default uses that as a stick to cast an eye on their credibility.
tedplaysguitar Says:
May 3, 2009 - DailyMail? I am not that Machiavellian. method? Staines does allow by his own admission unsubstantiated racist and homophobe posts on his blog and maintains he has no control on them. Comment does disappear when highlighted, with the Fraser Browns diagnosis with cystic fibrosis unhinged comments of 30.11.06. I fully agree that there is a need for honest factual disclosure in media/gov, as you say, there is a huge amount of wrong. I have doubts over method of this particular blog gate keeper.
tedplaysguitar Says:
May 3, 2009 - I do agree with Staines though that most trad/maintream journalists at times craft their questions to politicians in the fear they will be ostracised if they bring up awkward searching points, as with the junior Sky journalist that ruffled Cameron's feathers and anger control when he became leader, as Adam Boultons said to Staines it took awhile to get full access again, so in that respect Staines is going where others fear to tread and escapes the bulling of media advisers and spin doctors.
zzxzqwq Says:
May 3, 2009 - I would whip White's buttocks in a debate.
trevster2905 Says:
May 3, 2009 - The fact that the sources don't need backing up does not imply more accurate reporting. If anything it has the opposite effect.
MoonAharshMistress Says:
May 3, 2009 - Actually it doesnt. More truth comes out ..if people are willing to listen to other peoples disclosure...judicial evidence cannot be obtained from true heavyweights, now can it? think about it, 4% of rapes are prosecuted, even with evidence.....grounded damnation works better en masse
MoonAharshMistress Says:
May 3, 2009 - I, for one, am conviced paxo is a lackey of the establishment, Mr White..not because, the beauty of yr rhetoric spells out the absurdity that " the lackeys of the establishment are 'constrained legally by law to appear to be lackeys of the establishment' " , BUT BECAUSE THEY ARE LACKEYS OF THE Fucking ESTABLISHMENT. lol, hence their even getting the job in the first place and not some other gifted wordsmith down the street....zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzwake me up after the dark ages
MoonAharshMistress Says:
May 3, 2009 - Im not pro-Staines...ok, heres what I'll say against him, to show Im logical and serious on the matter of being taken seriously rational: Mr White was right to belittle Staines' pride in tuft-hunting from the Guardian: "I must be good, cos the Guardian gave me an award..one u coveted" ...Well, saying that to an insider, is ridiculous, the sign of the amateur as far as Whites concerned (it also proves, tho, PS is not a paid professional, unless hes the next Gielgud,altho,hmnn, i doubt it)
trevster2905 Says:
May 7, 2009 - That is quite a far right wing view to be taking.
gizlington Says:
May 7, 2009 - IN RESPONSE TO THIS FROM MOONARSE: "reporters dont "break" stories..theyre just told shit....if their editor and lawyers say it toes the party line they paste it up, if it doesnt, its discarded and noones any the wiser... Most copy is stolen: working methods include bugging, hacking, pandering for favors/access to info, accepting huge bribes from stars agents to use paper as tableaux..." maybe you should give it a go moonarse, you naive dilettante fuckwit. you're well out of the loop darling.
MoonAharshMistress Says:
May 9, 2009 - And who taught it me? When it comes to cross-party corruption on issues that really matter(and their sycophant advisors underlings) everyone is pretty partisan as long as they get feathers in the cap and get paid.... plump for Tory...plump for nulabour...?... ...Why bother, The Establishment will get in.
MoonAharshMistress Says:
May 9, 2009 - hmnn..is this the school of Derek Draper psychoanalysis...
chewbaccadefense99 Says:
May 10, 2009 - What a bunch of smug condescending wankers. They really have got this we know whats best for you oiks patter down to a T. This is exactly the reason blogs like Guido Fawkes are taking off and Paxman and the rest are being consigned to the dustbin of history. Viva the Internet!!!
BULLETPROOFGONG Says:
May 30, 2009 - Proved right , MPs are all crooks
MarxBakuninMe Says:
Jun 7, 2009 - Private Eye responded to Staines' email-slur story by mentioning that on the Guido Fawkes website his slavish fans posted a load of disgusting drivel about G.B.'s son (who was diagnosed with this or that - 30th November 2006). I haven't been able to find it on the website; presumably it has been removed, or I can't find it, even after searching many times. If it's the former: is this ridiculous character any better than the politicians he's supposed to despise?
pvuf431 Says:
Jun 22, 2009 - Paul Staines is a tit.
tugsandtost Says:
Aug 13, 2009 - Paul Staines gets humiliated here.
tidalwave1978 Says:
Sep 8, 2009 - I love the fact that Guido's Stain (or whatever his name is) responds by saying, "You didn't expose John Prescott for shagging his secretary..." Because, of course, the cutting edge of political journalism is all about who's shagging who. Everyone has an agenda, Giddy Forks included. The only way to keep abreast of the *facts*, and form your own opinion, is to get your news from a wide range of sources, not just those whose opinions align with your own.
dwjp Says:
Sep 14, 2009 - undercover, yet making sure the silver streak is visible
murrayg Says:
Sep 17, 2009 - What a self-regarding prick Staines is. Beautiful unmasking
nbarrett100 Says:
Oct 3, 2009 - Paul Staines what a twat
paxdemocratica Says:
Oct 4, 2009 - What a complete charlatan Paul Staines is.
AlbertBundy Says:
Nov 16, 2009 - This is hilarious. 2:08 - 2:32 is solid gold.
cjmooney9 Says:
Nov 18, 2009 - Guido Fawkes is little more than a tory front group. Just like the tax payers alliance He was exposed years ago, as working his web site from tory party servers. They put him off shore, to act as their leak/smear merchant. Knowing nobody can sue him there Just the tories "red rag" forum I'm afraid.
tedplaysguitar Says:
May 3, 2009 - your point taken, with due respect by your very own criteria with this 'measure' in mind one can say as well it is within reason when a person with full prior knowledge drives a car with no insurance (coupled with being over the limit twice) it constitutes something more than a 'problem'. It was his pre meditated decision. His pre meditated action was admitted under oath . He knew he had no insurance but took the decision to drive coupled with being over the limit. Only my humble view.