Thunderf00t - Answers Creationists (Full Version)

vbirdieb Says:

Oct 20, 2009 - Well, you see there's evidence that supports what I believe, but you would discount it. And I'm not looking for things or believing things just because it agrees with me. It has to be obvious and provable by some means. The difference is I don't discount them just because the science community rejects them. Why? Because they disagree, not because they have no education in the field. I don't want to call someone a liar just because they don't agree with me. Take care

vbirdieb Says:

Oct 20, 2009 - I'll check it out if I get a chance. But I'm busy researching or looking into scriptural books that wasn't included in the K.J.V. bible. He had 12 apostles and we don't even half in the K.J.V. bible. Take care.

zqusair Says:

Oct 21, 2009 - 00:50-1:00 if adam and eve had an equal genes and mid diversity of all kinds of genes and hypotheticaly had alot of babies, then the offsprings will be diverse. so your explaination here doesn't apply in this point and we wont have the color of hair, eyes or skin!! The evolutionary explaination for diversity of people right now comes from the fact of natural selection.

martiangrundy Says:

Oct 23, 2009 - Good for you. But you do realise if you really do dig into the reality of the bible, and historicity honestly, and truthfully, you will come up against some uncomfortable things. Have you researched the councils of nicea, and the bibles canonisation, and how it's made up from lots of different writings, and just how many were actually left out, and the changes made? It seems to me a large number who undertake this honestly, wind up with it in some way starting to challenge their beliefs. Ta Ta

SRAANG01 Says:

Oct 24, 2009 - I completely agree. The Bible falls apart when you start to truly investigate and not jump to conclusions. That's the thing with religion in general...it forces you to not think in order for others to control you from as early as an age as possible.

liraider Says:

Oct 24, 2009 - Men give birth to monkies, he's living proof. I jest.

rsavis Says:

Oct 25, 2009 - I get a kick out of thunderfoot, he is a cereberal priest. I agree with most of what he post. I believe that absolute verification of evolution is around the corner in that man himself will instruct and cause a major leap forward in human evolution. Be looking for my videos titled "Mr Constitution" and I will explain.

rsavis Says:

Oct 25, 2009 - What I find amusing about evolution is that the scientist behind it accept thier theories on faith that thye are correct when some facts of the thoery cannot be proven 100%

questionsamson Says:

Oct 26, 2009 - No wonder we're all stupid. We are all inbred!!

mortensjoegren Says:

Oct 27, 2009 - I find it more amusing that people think science has anything to do with faith.

creepyoldman2 Says:

Oct 28, 2009 - Do you see how he thinks about his answer? christians don't do this. God thinks for them. And when i say God i think everyone knows what I mean, a 2000 year old zombie who can walk on water and beat money changers

firstborn678 Says:

Oct 30, 2009 - Zqusair - You're only half right. For *all* human beings to come from 2 original sources we would have AT MOST only 4 unique versions (alleles) of any individual gene at a given locus (One unique version on each chromosome - 2 per person * 2 people = 4 possible versions MAX). Given this limitation it is still incredibly unreasonable to explain the extreme amount of variation found within the human organism - without evolution to account for observed increases since the "garden", that is.

mrsuperterd Says:

Nov 3, 2009 - what?? o.k he created lifed.n.a not the unverivse or matter

ElProximo Says:

Nov 3, 2009 - You should try and explain why you do not look exactly the same as your parents and why they do not look exactly the same as their parents? Seriously. I'm not joking - you should really answer that question. Now I already know your answer so what I want you to do is simply extrapolate that answer back and back and back. OH SNAP! Woops! Then remove this video to save yourself the embarrassment.

aozf05 Says:

Nov 4, 2009 - yeah if we do that we'd pretty much get what evolution predicts. thanks for that pointless mind experiment

sjh7132 Says:

Nov 6, 2009 - The mixture of 4 genes from 2 parents could account for up to 3 or colors of hair color, etc. But you aren't going to get multiple races of people from only 2 without evolution.

ElProximo Says:

Nov 6, 2009 - We have 3 families that repopulate. Shem, Ham and Japeth (and their wives of course), and, interestingly we have 3 unique 'looks' in the human family today. As for colour: There is only one skin colour for all humans (who have little diversity) and that is this sort of 'golden browny' colour, but, there has been some cool debates about red-hair lately (and red heads are in Genesis too heh), but, Yes, Adam and Eve would have had all the genetic choices seen today. Extrapolate backwards?

sjh7132 Says:

Nov 8, 2009 - It would be interesting to know if your 'three looks' are universally accepted? Or is it a 'there is us and they all look the same type of thing'. I'm guessing Asians, Hispanics and Caucasions would classify the 3 looks entirely differently.

dib07ce Says:

Nov 11, 2009 - 3??? there has got to be at least 4. since there are 4 different colors of people. white, black, brown, and yellow. and of course you dont look exactly like your parents, but you do look like a combination of the two, or may inherit a gene from their parents. well call that science, its been proven. based on every picture ive seen of adam and eve. we all should be white. no matter how many babies a white couple has, they wont pop out a black one, without evolution of course.

Roddog61 Says:

Nov 13, 2009 - I'm beginning to think this guy is one of my heroes. Amazingly smart dude.

HelplessVictim Says:

Nov 13, 2009 - Because it's logically impossible to look exactly like two different-looking things at once?

ElProximo Says:

Nov 13, 2009 - That may be but you don't even look exactly like a combination of your parents. That is saying 'look'. If you are like most people you 'express' some 'looks' that neither of your parents had. You may well express (and then look like) something your grandmother also expressed or even a great grandfather has only expressed. btw.. even a layman can grasp genetic markers and mapping humans back and back into original families (so far as its gone) so there is a vid for this guy to make ya?

asoul576 Says:

Nov 13, 2009 - There are so many assumptions and dead ends in this video.

questionsamson Says:

Nov 16, 2009 - I have asked theists if Adam and .Eve were to procreate there wouldn't be much genetic diversity and we have seen what happens when family members copulate.. They fire back, "that is because they were pure etc" Great they were Nazi's.

RapsFan39 Says:

Nov 21, 2009 - Once you've debated enough Religious people, you start to realize they have no real argument. A debate with them is pointless. They won't accept certain concepts because it conflicts with their leap of faith. After a while I start to realize their opinion doesn't matter because it doesn't have any substance. Now I ask questions that they can't answer and highlight the importance of education. In the end their argument is one of blind faith. Denying logic and reason in order to believe.